The value of life is a subjective matter that often dictates
people’s lives. Throughout the play, the question of mortality is faced by
multiple characters in the play. Hamlet’s begins pondering about the meaning of
life after the death of his father. His views on the subject of mortality are
dynamic and they change as the play progresses.
His initial opinions are revealed
in Act 3 scene 1 with the “To be, or not be” soliloquy. Through this, Hamlet
debates on whether it is nobler to go through the struggles of life or to take
his life. He describes death as a way to
“end the heart-ache, and the thousand natural shocks” (3.1.62-63). At this
point, Hamlet is in a suicidal state as he wonders why he should have to battle
through life when he can end it “with a bare bodkin” (3.1.77). After mourning
over his father’s death, Hamlet overhears Claudius confessing that he killed
his father. This stirs up anger in Hamlet. Although Hamlet has the perfect
chance to kill Claudius, he chooses not to.
This quote clearly portrays Hamlet’s change in perception. He is no
longer debating on whether he should or shouldn’t kill himself. His “thoughts
be bloody” as all he was suddenly hungry to kill Claudius. At this point, Hamlet has given in to the
madness that he has been displaying. The traits associated with madness begin
to come into play as Hamlet strives to find the perfect way to kill Claudius. Based on the situations mentioned above, it is
evident that Hamlet’s opinion on the subject of mortality has changed. He is no
longer interested in killing himself. All he wants is to avenge Claudius for
the death of his father.

http://lifehacker.com/5799860/the-smarter-way-to-seek-revenge
Very interesting point about Hamlets change in his view of morality! I studied and performed "To Be or Not TO Be " and I agree that his view on Morality changed over the play. However I think that his View of Morality changes in a different way. Hamlet becomes more desensitized to death but no necessarily more inclined to murder.
ReplyDelete